Previous | Table of Contents | Next

List of Tables

• 1.1. Site Type Definitions
• 1.2. Feature Type Definitions

• 2.1.Variables recorded in computerized data base
• 2.2. Ceramic date groups used in identifying temporal components
• 2.3. Functional component types used in the computer database
• 2.4. Feature types used in the computer database
• 2.5. Component type proportions within each survey area
• 2.6. Mean component size data
• 2.7. Ceramic assemblages recorded for the various component types
• 2.8. Lithic assemblages recorded for the various component types
• 2.9. Component types ranked by proportions of vessel forms and ware categories
• 2.10. Component types ranked by proportions of nonlocal ceramics
• 2.11. Lithic ratios by component type
• 2.12. Distribution of each Anasazi component type across the survey areas
• 2.13. Mean component size (m2) data by survey area
• 2.14. Ceramic assemblages recorded for the various component types by area
• 2.15. Distribution of component types by date group
• 2.16. Distribution of component types by beginning date
• 2.17. Habitation component subtypes by date group
• 2.18. Mean visible and estimated room counts by date group
• 2.19. Mean feature area data by date group
• 2.20. Numbers of components in major date groups by survey area
• 2.21. Ceramic assemblages recorded for the various component types by date group
• 2.22. Lithic ratios by date group
• 2.23. Results of cluster analysis for ten clusters
• 2.24. Results of cluster analysis for five clusters
• 2.25. Kin Klizhin component types by vegetative/geomorphic zone
• 2.26. Distance in meters to Kin Klizhin Chacoan structure by component type and date group
• 2.27. Kin Bineola component types by vegetative/geomorphic zone
• 2.28. Distance in meters to Kin Bineola Chacoan structure (29SJ 1580) by component type and date group
• 2.29. Chacra Mesa component types by vegetative/geomorphic zone
• 2.30. South Addition component types by vegetative/geomorphic zone
• 2.31. Population and area under roof, modern Pueblos
• 2.32. Population estimate totals
• 2.33. Population estimates disregarding Chacoan structures
• 2.34. Comparison of Hayes (1981) inventory survey results by time period with results of the current study
• 2.35. Archaic and Unknown component types by survey area
• 2.36. Lithic assemblages: Archaic and Unknown components

• 3.1. Hectares of vegetative/topographic types by survey addition
• 3.2. Results of soil sample tests for Chaco Additions survey areas
• 3.3. Background soil data (Keetch 1980) for Chaco Additions survey areas
• 3.4. Hectares with fair and good agricultural potential, total hectares, and percent of survey areas with agricultural potential
• 3.5. Estimates of hectares with agricultural potential and number of people supported for the Chaco Additions survey areas and the Bis sa'ani community

• 4.1. List of proveniences sampled at less than 100% of total area of proveniance with sampling fraction
• 4.2. Distribution of ceramic site components, proveniences, and artifacts by culture and survey area
• 4.3. Distribution of ceramic site components by site type and culture
• 4.4. Distribution of sample of ceramic site proveniences by feature type and culture
• 4.5. Classification of site types into site type groups
• 4.6. Classification of feature types into feature type groups
• 4.7. Frequency of Anasazi ceramic components and artifacts by grouped site type and survey area
• 4.8. Frequency of Anasazi ceramic proveniences and artifacts by grouped feature types and survey area
• 4.9. Frequency of Anasazi ceramic proveniences and artifacts by deposit type and survey area
• 4.10. List of ceramic codes, estimated date ranges, and occurence frequencies for ceramic types recorded during inventory survey by survey areas
• 4.11. Results of cluster analysis determining number of clusters in date range data — Ward's average linkage hierarchical method
• 4.12a. Results of cluster analysis assigning members to date groups using K-means method
• 4.12b. Concordance of date groups used in analysis of survey data with temporal groups used for National Park Service Chaco Canyon excavation analyses.
• 4.13. Frequency of Navajo proveniences by ceramic date ranges
• 4.14. Distribution of sample of Anasazi ceramic proveniences and artifacts by survey area and date group
• 4.15. Frequency of Anasazi ceramics by date group and site type group for each survey area
• 4.16. Frequency of Anasazi ceramics by date group and feature type group for each survey area
• 4.17. Density of Anasazi ceramics at components by grouped site type and survey area
• 4.18. Density of Anasazi ceramics at proveniences by grouped feature type and survey area
• 4.19. Frequencies of Anasazi ceramics by ware
• 4.20. Vessel form frequencies for Cibola White Ware types
• 4.21. Vessel form frequencies for Chuska White Ware types
• 4.22. Vessel form frequencies for Mesa Verde White Ware types
• 4.23. Vessel form frequencies for Tusayan White Ware types
• 4.24. Vessel form frequencies for White Mountain Red Ware types
• 4.25. Vessel form frequencies for San Juan Red Ware, Tsegi Orange Ware, and Chuska Orange Ware
• 4.26. Vessel form frequencies for local versus nonlocal prehistoric ceramics
• 4.27. Distribution of ceramic wares by date group and survey area
• 4.28. Distribution of local and nonlocal wares by site type group and survey area
• 4.29. Great kivas and Chacoan structures used in regression analyses of distance
• 4.30. Results of regression analyses testing proportion of trachyte temper by distance to Chacoan structures and great kivas
• 4.31. Summary statistics for percent of trachyte in assemblages of large structural sites by area and date group compared with excavated Chaco Canyon small houses sites
• 4.32. Distance from Chuskas and percent of Chuska and Cibola Wares in San Juan Basin Chacoan structure assemblages
• 4.33. Ceramic vessel class frequencies by site type group and survey area
• 4.34. Univariate analysis of ceramic assemblage variables by site types
• 4.35. Mean percentages of functional ceramic classes in assemblages derived from cluster analysis — K-Means method
• 4.36. Frequency of assemblages in functional groups by deposit types
• 4.37. Frequency of assemblages in functional groups by site types
• 4.38. Frequency of assemblages in functional groups by feature types
• 4.39. Frequency of assemblages in functional groups by date group

• 5.1. Lithic artifacts by gross artifact type and cultural group, with sampling fraction
• 5.2. List of proveniences sampled at less than 100 percent of total area of provenience
• 5.3. Distribution of all lithic site components, proveniences, and artifacts by culture and survey area
• 5.4. Distribution of lithic site components by site type and culture
• 5.5. Distribution of lithic site proveniences by feature type and culture
• 5.6. Classification of site types into site type groups
• 5.7. Classification of feature types into feature type groups
• 5.8. Frequency of site components and lithics by grouped site type for each survey area
• 5.9. Frequency of proveniences and lithics by grouped feature type for each survey area
• 5.10. Frequency of proveniences and lithics by deposit type for each survey area
• 5.11. Temporal distribution of Anasazi proveniences and lithics by survey area
• 5.12. Frequency of Anasazi lithics by time group and grouped site type for each survey area
• 5.13. Frequency of Anasazi lithics by time group and grouped feature type for each survey area
• 5.14. Density of lithics (artifacts per m2) at all components by grouped site type and survey area
• 5.15. Density of lithics (artifacts per m2) at all proveniences by grouped feature type and survey area
• 5.16. Classification of material types into material type groups
• 5.17. Frequency of artifact type by material type for all lithic artifacts
• 5.18. Distribution of material type by Anasazi time period
• 5.19. Distribution of material type by Anasazi time periods and survey area
• 5.20. Distribution of nonlocal materials by Anasazi site type groups and area
• 5.21. Great kivas and Chacoan structures used in rank ordering of distance by survey areas and time group
• 5.22. Proportion of nonlocal material at Anasazi sites in the Kin Klizhin and Kin Bineola survey areas ordered by distance to nearest Chacoan structure or great kiva
• 5.23. Distribution of nonlocal material at large structural sites from the survey areas and from small house sites in Chaco Canyona by time period and area
• 5.24. Distribution of nonlocal material at Chacoan structures and great kivas in the survey areas compared to some Chacoan structures in Chaco Canyon
• 5.25. Material type by culture for Chacra Mesa and Kin Klizhin
• 5.26. Total lithic assemblage
• 5.27. Total debitage by flake type
• 5.28. Total debitage to tool and formal to informal tool ratios
• 5.29. Flake type percentages by survey area
• 5.30. Ratios of debitage and tools, and formal and informal tools by survey area
• 5.31. Flake type percentages by culture
• 5.32. Flake type percentages at sites in the Kin Klizhin survey area by culture
• 5.33. Flake type percentages at sites in the Chacra Mesa survey area by culture
• 5.34. Ratios of debitage and tools, and formal and informal tools by culture
• 5.35. Tool type percentages by culture
• 5.36. Ratios of debitage and tools at Kin Klizhin by culture
• 5.37. Ratios of debitage and tools at Chacra Mesa by culture
• 5.38. Ratios of debitage and tools at Kin Bineola by culture
• 5.39. Ratios of debitage and tools at South Addition by culture
• 5.40. Flake type percentages at Anasazi site types
• 5.41. Ratios of debitage and tools at the Anasazi site types
• 5.42. Tool type percentages at the Anasazi site types
• 5.43. Ratios of debitage and tools at grouped Anasazi feature types
• 5.44. Flake type percentages at Anasazi sites by time period
• 5.45. Ratios of debitage and tools at Anasazi sites from the time periods
• 5.46. Flake type percentages at Kin Klizhin Anasazi sites by time period
• 5.47. Flake type percentages at Chacra Mesa Anasazi sites by time period
• 5.48. Flake type percentages at Kin Bineola Anasazi sites by time period
• 5.49. Flake type percentages at South Addition Anasazi sites by time period
• 5.50. Ratios of debitage and tools at Chacra Mesa Anasazi sites by time period
• 5.51. Ratios of debitage and tools at Kin Bineola Anasazi sites by time period
• 5.52. Ratios of debitage and tools at South Addition Anasazi sites by time period
• 5.53. Tool type percentages at sites in the Chacra Mesa survey area by culture
• 5.54. Tool type percentages at camps by culture
• 5.55. Diversity calculations for Anasazi site types
• 5.56. Tool type percentages at Anasazi feature types
• 5.57. Tool assemblages from small structures from the survey areas
• 5.58. Tool type percentages from Anasazi time periods
• 5.59. Tool type percentages at sites in the Chacra Mesa survey area from the Anasazi time group
• 5.60. Tool type percentages at sites in the Kin Bineola survey area from the Anasazi time group
• 5.61. Tool type percentages at sites in the Kin Klizhin survey area from the Anasazi time groups
• 5.62. Tool type percentages at sites in the South Addition survey area from the Anasazi time groups
• 5.63. Ratios of chipped stone to groundstone, minerals, and ornaments by culture
• 5.64. Ratios of chipped stone to groundstone, minerals, and ornaments from the Anasazi time periods
• 5.65. Ratios of chipped stone to groundstone, minerals, and ornaments by Anasazi feature type groups
• 5.66. Ratios of chipped stone to groundstone, minerals, and ornaments by survey areas
• 5.67. Ratios of chipped stone to groundstone, minerals, and ornaments at Anasazi grouped site types
• 5.68. Ratios of chipped stone to groundstone, minerals, and ornaments at small structures in all survey areas
• 5.69. Distribution of all local and nonlocal materials by artifact type
• 5.70. Percentage of nonlocal and local flakes in the total assemblage
• 5.71. Nonlocal and local debitage and tools at Anasazi and Archaic sites
• 5.72. Nonlocal and local debitage and tools by time group at Anasazi sites
• 5.73. Nonlocal and local debitage and tools at Anasazi grouped site types
• 5.74. Tools of nonlocal and local materials from Anasazi grouped site types
• 5.75. Nonlocal and local debitage and tools at Anasazi sites in the survey areas

• 6.1. Navajo and historic components by temporal period
• 6.2. Number of sites of each type by survey area
• 6.3. Number of components of each type by time period
• 6.4. Spanish-American and Anglo site components
• 6.5. Number of single habitation sites containing each feature type
• 6.6. Single habitation components: mean area in m2 by time period
• 6.7. Major features present at dated single habitation components
• 6.8. Number of multiple habitation sites containing each type of feature
• 6.9. Multiple habitation components: mean area in m2 by time period
• 6.10. Major features present at dated multiple habitation components
• 6.11. Tree-ring dates from sweat lodge sites
• 6.12. Burials recorded in the project area
• 6.13. Miscellaneous stone feature sites
• 6.14. Brainerd-Robinson Correlation Coefficients for total number of artifacts
• 6.15. Brainerd-Robinson Correlation Coefficients for number of artifact groups
• 6.16. Mean number of artifacts for each major site type by time period
• 6.17. Mean number of artifact groups for each major site type by time period
• 6.18. Number of sites with beehive ovens, storage features, and ash/trash piles present
• 6.19. Attributes indicating winter use at habitations and temporary shelter sites
• 6.20. Site density (number of sites per km2)
• 6.21. Distances (in meters) from Chacra Mesa habitation sites to water and agricultural lands
• 6.22. Nearest neighbor analysis for habitation sites on Chacra Mesa

• 7.1. Historic artifacts by assemblage groups and material class
• 7.2. Assemblage groups by survey area
• 7.3. Navajo and historic Pueblo ceramic types by vessel form
• 7.4. Lithic materials at Navajo and historic components
• 7.5. Euro-American manufactured materials at Navajo and historic components
• 7.6. Miscellaneous materials at Navajo and historic components
• 7.7. Anasazi ceramics by vessel form at Navajo and historic period components
• 7.8. Assemblage size by time period and site type
• 7.9. Artifact groups by time period
• 7.10. Artifact assemblages by site type and time period for all components with historic artifacts
• 7.11. Frequency of Navajo and historic components with artifacts by time period
• 7.12 Historic artifact types by time period (single period components only)
• 7.13 Navajo and historic Pueblo ceramic types by time period (single period components only)
• 7.14 Navajo and historic lithic materials by time period (single period components only)
• 7.15 Euro-American manufactured materials at Navajo and historic components by time period (single period components only)
• 7.16 Specific artifact types grouped by general functional artifact categories
• 7.17 Navajo and historic site types by time period with number of general functional categories. Components occupied during two or more time periods are excluded
• 7.18 Navajo and historic feature types by time period with number of general functional categories. Components occupied during two or more time periods are excluded
• 7.19 Features at 29SJ 2966 arranged by classes showing functional categories of artifacts with approximate date and number of artifacts

• 8.1a. Function and dates of sites according to informants
• 8.1b. Function and dates of sites compared with other data (Navajo use only)
• 8.2. Navajo occupants of sites
• 8.3. Kin and clan ties of occupants
• 8.4. Navajo activities on sites
• 8.5. Trails, wagon roads, and water sources
• 8.6. Abandonment and later Spanish use of Navajo sites (includes sites not visited by informants)

• 9.1. Chaco Canyon Archaic components by survey
• 9.2. Archaic components and isolates
• 9.3. Summary of ceramic date groups